Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Stimulsoft Reports.NET discussion
Post Reply
mssloan
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:51 am
Location: Hinckley, Leicestershire

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by mssloan »

Hi,

I am trying to use Stimulsoft .Net to print to a label to Zebra QL320Plus label printer. Generating exactly the same label using two difference versions of Stimulsoft I get different results:

Version 2009.2.405.0

The label prints fine. Here is the header of the label printed to a file:
! 0 200 200 406 1
PW 479
TONE 0
SPEED 4
ON-FEED IGNORE
NO-PACE
BAR-SENSE
PCX 0 0

Version 2009.2.460.0

I just get two blank labels. Here is the header of the label printed to a file:
! 0 200 200 351 1
PW 588
TONE 0
SPEED 4
ON-FEED IGNORE
NO-PACE
BAR-SENSE
PCX 0 0
With this version, the label prints OK on other printers.

When previewed in the report viewer both versions of Stimulsoft show the label correctly. Why do the two versions print exactly the same label differently? Has this been recognised as an issue? If so, has it been fixed in the latest version? Can I get an explanation of these commands to the QL printer?

Regards,
mssloan
Alex K.
Posts: 6488
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:37 am

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by Alex K. »

Hello,

Please check the last prerelease build and let us know about the result.

Thank you.
mssloan
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:51 am
Location: Hinckley, Leicestershire

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by mssloan »

I tried with the latest trial verion with exactly the same results as Version 2009.2.460.0 with the same header

Version 2011.1.1000.0

I just get two blank labels. Here is the header of the label printed to a file:
! 0 200 200 351 1
PW 588
TONE 0
SPEED 4
ON-FEED IGNORE
NO-PACE
BAR-SENSE
PCX 0 0

Regards,
mssloan
mssloan
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:51 am
Location: Hinckley, Leicestershire

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by mssloan »

I get exactly the same result with Version 2011.2.1022.0 (latest prelease) as Version 2011.1.1000.0 with the same header

Version 2011.2.1022.0

I just get two blank labels. Here is the header of the label printed to a file:
! 0 200 200 351 1
PW 588
TONE 0
SPEED 4
ON-FEED IGNORE
NO-PACE
BAR-SENSE
PCX 0 0

Regards,
mssloan
Alex K.
Posts: 6488
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:37 am

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by Alex K. »

Hello,
mssloan wrote:Version 2009.2.405.0
! 0 200 200 406 1
PW 479
...
and
mssloan wrote:Version 2009.2.460.0
! 0 200 200 351 1
PW 588
...
In the first post you have defined the printer settings. They slightly differ for different versions. Could you clarify me on these settings.

Thank you.
mssloan
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:51 am
Location: Hinckley, Leicestershire

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by mssloan »

I don't know what these settings are. These are the files generated when I select print to file instead of print to the label printer. The header is different for version 405 (the only one out the versions I tested which work). All printouts were generated on the same PC with the same label printer driver. The only thing which was changed was the version of Stimulsoft. I could switch between versions and the only one which works is 405, even the though the label looks OK in preview on all versions and prints on other printers in all versions.

Regards,
mssloan
Ivan
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:37 am

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by Ivan »

Hello,

Can you please send us a sample report template with data or a simple test project, which reproduces the issue, for analysis?

Thank you.
mssloan
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:51 am
Location: Hinckley, Leicestershire

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by mssloan »

Sorry for the delay in replying. Here is the report file for the label being printed:

http://www.4shared.com/file/4TsGpSa5/Tr ... n_lab.html

Regards,
mssloan

Alex K.
Posts: 6488
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:37 am

Label printing with Zebra QL320+

Post by Alex K. »

Hello,

Can you please send test data for you report.

Thank you.
Post Reply